Circular Communities: The circular value flower as a design method for collectively closing resource flows

Authors

Els Leclercq
Department of Management in the Built Environment, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0605-7123
Mo Smit
Department of Architectural Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34641/mg.62
Keywords: circular economy, multiple value creation, co-production, spatial interventions, citizen engagement, integral approach, community design, neighbourhood design

Synopsis

In Circular Communities, pioneering, collectively supported initiatives that are aimed at closing resource cycles at neighbourhood level take a central position. They are all examples of initiatives that contribute to the transition to a circular economy. For the analysis of these different circular initiatives, the researchers – urban designer Els Leclercq and architect Mo Smit - developed a unique method: the Circular Value Flower method. This method helps to organize the collective closing of resource cycles (bio and tech materials, energy, water and nutrients) on a neighbourhood scale and provides insight into the added value (social, ecological, aesthetic, cultural and economic) that can be realized within the built environment. Circular Communities offers inspiration and lessons for integral sustainable interventions at the scale of the neighbourhood and ties in with the new Dutch Environmental Planning Act, which explicitly offers room for citizen initiatives and local commissioning in the Netherlands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Els Leclercq, Department of Management in the Built Environment, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Els is an urban designer, researcher and lecturer at the Delft University of Technology and Erasmus University Rotterdam. She carries out research into new organizational structures for innovative urban processes and how these structures play a role in the transition to a sustainable built environment. She is also interested in how decentralized circular approaches can provide technical and societal solutions at a global and local scale. Here, active involvement of citizens, datafication and digitalization (or the ‘smart city’) and a just and sustainable city take a central position. Els holds a PhD from the TU Delft’s Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment. The title of her thesis was ‘Privatisation of the Production of Public Space’.

Mo Smit, Department of Architectural Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Mo Smit is an architect and works as a lecturer and researcher within the Chair of Architectural Engineering at the Delft University of Technology’s Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment. Together with colleagues and students, she studies and develops solutions for a circular built environment, where she focuses on the innovation of bio-based construction methods and processes. As a result of her activities in Indonesia, she developed a passion for regional architecture, self-build communities and bio-based materials. Recently she initiated Bouwtuin in the Netherlands: cooperative action research that focuses on the use of natural building materials from the region.

References

Actieagenda Ruimtelijk Ontwerp 2017-2020:

Samen Werken aan Ontwerpkracht.

(Spatial Design Action Programme:

Working on Design Power Together)

https://samenwerkenaanontwerpkracht.nl

Aiken, G.T. (2017). The politics of community:

Togetherness, transition and post-politics.

Environmental Planning A. 49: 2383–2401

Arnstein, S. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation.

Journal of the American Institute of

Planners. 35(4): 216-224

Bekkers, V., Tummers, L. (2018). Innovation

in the public sector: Towards an open and

collaborative approach. International Review

of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 209–213

Bosschaert, T. (2022), Circularity is not sustainability

- how well-intentioned concepts distract

us from our true goals, and how SiD can

help navigate that challenge. In: The impossibilities

of the Circular Economy – Separating

Aspirations from Reality. New York: Routledge

See also: https://360dialogues.com/

portfolios/ce-impossibilities

Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple

Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix

and how do knowledge, innovation and the

environment relate to each other?: A proposed

framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of

sustainable development and social ecology.

International Journal of Social Ecology and

Sustainable Development (IJSESD). 1(1): 41-69

Davoudi, S., Madanipour, A. (red.) (2015).

Reconsidering Localism. New York: Routledge

De Bruin (2017) Participatiesamenleving anno

: volop kansen (Participation society in

: ample opportunities), Movisie.

Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., Stern, P. (2003). The

Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science.

: 1907- 1912)

Durose, C., Escobar, O., Gilchrist, A., Agger,

A., Henderson, J., Van Hulst, M., Van Ostaijen,

M. (2019). Socially smart cities: Making a

difference in urban neighbourhoods

http://smart-urban-intermediaries.com

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2012). Towards

the circular economy: economic and business

rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen

MacArthur Foundation.

Evans, J., Karvonen, A., Raven, R. (eds). 2016.

The Experimental City. London: Routledge

Fainstein, S. (2010). The Just City. Cornell

University Press

Florida, R. (2008). Who’s Your City? How the

Creative Economy Is Making Where to Live

the Most Important Decision of Your Life.

Basic Books

Fotino, F., Calabrese, M., Lettieri, M. (2018).

Co-creating value in urban public policy contexts:

A different approach. Land Use Policy.

: 20-29

Franklin, A., Marsden, T. (2015). (Dis)connected

communities and sustainable placemaking.

Local Environment 20, 940–956

Gemeente Amsterdam (2020) Stadsmonitor

Amsterdam (City Monitor Amsterdam).

Ghisellini, P., Cialani. C., Ulgiati. S. (2016).

A review on circular economy: The expected

transition to a balanced interplay of environmental

and economic systems. Journal of

Cleaner Production. 114(7): 11-32

Hajer, M. (2009). Authoritative Governance:

Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization.

Oxford University Press

Hajer, M. (2011). Signalenrapport ‘De energieke

samenleving. Op zoek naar sturingsfilosofie

voor een schone economie’ (Signal report

‘The energetic society. In search of steering

philosophy for a clean economy’). Netherlands

Environmental Assessment Agency

Hughes, S., Hoffmann, M. (2020). Just urban

transitions: Toward a research agenda. Wiley

Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,

(3).

Klijn, E-H., Koppenjan, J. (2015). Governance

Networks in the Public Sector. Oxford:

Routledge

Koefoed, O. (2019). Urban nature as transformed

practice – A case of multi-dimensional

processing to increase public value in

Copenhagen. Local Economy. 34(6) 525–54

Kuitert, L. (2021) The balancing act. How

public construction clients safeguard public

values in a changing construction industry.

Delft University of Technology

Lloyd, K., Fullagar, S., Reid, S., (2016). Where

is the ‘Social’ in Constructions of ‘Liveability’?

Exploring Community, Social Interaction and

Social Cohesion in Changing Urban Environments,

Urban Policy and Research. 34:4,

-355

Majoor, S., Smit, V. (2019). De wijk als plek van

verandering (The neighbourhood as a place of

change). In: Helleman, G., Majoor, S., Smit, V.,

Walraven, G. Plekken van hoop en verandering.

Samenwerkingsverbanden die lokaal het

verschil maken (Places of hope and change.

Partnerships that make the difference locally).

Utrecht: Academische Uitgeverij Eburon.

Mattijssen, T. J. M., Buijs, A. A. E., Elands, B. H.

M., Arts, B. J. M., van Dam, R. I., & Donders, J.

L. M. (2019). The Transformative Potential of

Active Citizenship: Understanding Changes

in Local Governance Practices. Sustainability.

(20)

Meijer A.J. (2014). New Media and the Coproduction

of Safety: An Empirical Analysis

of Dutch Practices. The American Review of

Public Administration. 44(1): 17-34

Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat (Ministry

of Infrastructure and Water Management)

(2016). Nederland Circulair in 2050 –

Rijksbreed Programma Circulaire Economie

(The Netherlands Circular in 2050 - Government-

wide Circular Economy Programme).

OECD (2020), How’s Life? 2020: Measuring

Well-being, OECD Publishing, Paris,

https://doi.org/10.1787/9870c393-en

Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving (Netherlands

Environmental Assessment Agency)

(2019). Scenario’s voor stedelijke ontwikkeling,

infrastructuur en mobiliteit – verdieping

bij oefenen met de toekomst (Scenarios

for urban development, infrastructure and

mobility - greater depth when practising with

the future).

Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving (Netherlands

Environmental Assessment Agency)

(2019). Circulaire Economie in Kaart (Circular

Economy Explored).

www.pbl.nl/sites/default/downloads/

pbl-circulaire-economie-in-kaart-3401

Pomponi, F., Moncaster, A., (2017). Circular

Economy for the Built Environment:

A Research Framework. Journal of Cleaner

Production. 143: 710-18.

Raworth, K. (2017) Doughnut Economics.

Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century

Economist. London: Penguin Random House

Reinhard, S., Verhagen, J., Wolters, W., Ruerd,

R. (2017). Water-food-energy nexus: A quick

scan. Wageningen, Wageningen Economic

Research, Report 2017-096.

https://edepot.wur.nl/424551

Rijksoverheid (Government of the Netherlands)

(2019). Klimaatakkoord (Climate Agreement).

https://www.klimaatakkoord.nl

Soeterbroek, F. (2015). Stadsmakers als happy

infiltrators in de systeemwereld (City-makers

as happy infiltrators in the systemic world).

In: Franke, S., Niemans, J., Soeterbroek, F. Het

Nieuwe Stadmaken - Van gedreven pionieren

naar gelijk speelveld (The New City-making -

From passionate pioneering to level playing

field). TrancityXValiz.

Soja, E. (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice.

University of Minnesota Press

Trebeck, K., en Williams, J. (2019). The Economics

of Arrival: Ideas for a grown-up economy.

Bristol: Policy Press

Uitermark, J. (2015). Longing for Wikitopia:

The study and politics of self-organisation.

Urban Studies. 52(13): 2301-2312

Van der Schot, J. (2016). Besturen met

Burgerkracht, samenspel in de energieke

samenleving (Governing with Citizen Power,

interplay in the energetic society).

Retrieved from:

https://www.duurzaamdoor.nl/sites/default/

files/2019-02/Duurzaam%20Door%20

Besturen%20door%20Burgerkracht%20

proef5.pdf

Van de Wijdeven, T. (2012). Doe democratie

- Over actief burgerschap in stadswijken (Do

democracy - On active citizenship in urban

neighbourhoods). Delft: Uitgeverij Eburon

Van Dorst, M. (2012). Liveability. In: Van

Bueren,

E., Van Bohemen, H., Itard, L.,

Visscher,

H. Sustainable Urban Environments

- An Eco-system Approach. Dordrecht:

Springer

Van Reybrouck, D. (2016). Tegen Verkiezingen

(Against Elections). Uitgeverij De Bezige Bij

b.v.

Wilcox, D., (1994). The Guide to Effective

Participation. London: Partnership Books

Image of the book Circular Communities

Downloads

Download PDF
Order hard copy
Dutch version of the book

Published

February 21, 2023

Categories

Copyright (c) 2023 Els Leclerq, Mo Smit

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Details about the available publication format: Download PDF

ISBN-13 (15)

9789462087415

Publication date (01)

2023-02-21